<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XBLA Wednesday 7/2: It&#8217;s Soulcalibur Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Davn Kincade</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152434</link>
		<dc:creator>Davn Kincade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152434</guid>
		<description>@ James

Edge Master mode doesn&#039;t have any more depth than the Mission Mode in Soul Calibur and the differences are minor to be honest...Soul Calibur 2 and 3 on the other hand....well that&#039;s a different story.

Frankly it&#039;s not too surprising that younger gamers -don&#039;t- know of Soul Edge but -do- know of Soul Calibur...you have to remember that Soul Edge came out in 1997/98.

I will agree with you that the Soul Calibur series is losing a lot of ground in terms of depth and story, Namco/Bandi has started relying on gimmicks to sell the same game to multiple consoles to basically bait the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ James</p>
<p>Edge Master mode doesn&#8217;t have any more depth than the Mission Mode in Soul Calibur and the differences are minor to be honest&#8230;Soul Calibur 2 and 3 on the other hand&#8230;.well that&#8217;s a different story.</p>
<p>Frankly it&#8217;s not too surprising that younger gamers -don&#8217;t- know of Soul Edge but -do- know of Soul Calibur&#8230;you have to remember that Soul Edge came out in 1997/98.</p>
<p>I will agree with you that the Soul Calibur series is losing a lot of ground in terms of depth and story, Namco/Bandi has started relying on gimmicks to sell the same game to multiple consoles to basically bait the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James O'Rell</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152250</link>
		<dc:creator>James O'Rell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152250</guid>
		<description>To be honest, Soul Calibur was rather over rated in my book.  It&#039;s mission mode was a strip down piece of crap in comparison to the original Soul Blade&#039;s.  It seems a lot of people who hold that game is such high regard are (not all) ones who did not play the original.  I guess due to the name change some people don&#039;t realize that Soul Edge (or the Playstation version, Soul Blade) was the first in the series, not Soul Calibur.  Although the game plays well, it just doesn&#039;t stand up to its senior in terms of features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, Soul Calibur was rather over rated in my book.  It&#8217;s mission mode was a strip down piece of crap in comparison to the original Soul Blade&#8217;s.  It seems a lot of people who hold that game is such high regard are (not all) ones who did not play the original.  I guess due to the name change some people don&#8217;t realize that Soul Edge (or the Playstation version, Soul Blade) was the first in the series, not Soul Calibur.  Although the game plays well, it just doesn&#8217;t stand up to its senior in terms of features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybrpunk</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152245</link>
		<dc:creator>cybrpunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152245</guid>
		<description>I was all set to buy this one as soon as it released.  I loved the originals. But if it&#039;s really stripped down, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was all set to buy this one as soon as it released.  I loved the originals. But if it&#8217;s really stripped down, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davn Kincade</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152235</link>
		<dc:creator>Davn Kincade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152235</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, well it wouldn&#039;t be the first time Wiki is wrong about something, but....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul_Calibur

&quot;On April 16, 2008, Namco Bandai announced a port of Soulcalibur would be released for the Xbox 360. The game was available for download on Xbox Live Arcade on July 2, 2008 .[1] While the game would include HD updated graphics and various LIVE leaderboards, online play was confirmed by Namco to be exempt which makes it an exception amongst most games ported to Xbox LIVE Arcade. Other features from the Dreamcast version (Museum, etc., with the exception of Mission Battle) are also in the game. All content is unlocked by the start of the game&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, well it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time Wiki is wrong about something, but&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul_Calibur" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul_Calibur</a></p>
<p>&#8220;On April 16, 2008, Namco Bandai announced a port of Soulcalibur would be released for the Xbox 360. The game was available for download on Xbox Live Arcade on July 2, 2008 .[1] While the game would include HD updated graphics and various LIVE leaderboards, online play was confirmed by Namco to be exempt which makes it an exception amongst most games ported to Xbox LIVE Arcade. Other features from the Dreamcast version (Museum, etc., with the exception of Mission Battle) are also in the game. All content is unlocked by the start of the game&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152209</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152209</guid>
		<description>In regards to Mission Mode, I base that upon both having someone tell me it&#039;s not included, there being no mention in the press release, and not seeing it in the list of different modes in the game&#039;s main menu. So I&#039;m 99% sure it&#039;s not in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to Mission Mode, I base that upon both having someone tell me it&#8217;s not included, there being no mention in the press release, and not seeing it in the list of different modes in the game&#8217;s main menu. So I&#8217;m 99% sure it&#8217;s not in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davn Kincade</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/xbla-wednesday-72-its-soulcalibur-time/comment-page-1/#comment-152207</link>
		<dc:creator>Davn Kincade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=25583#comment-152207</guid>
		<description>*shrugs*

Well, if this is the original soul calibur which it looks like it is then it&#039;s a fairly old title...this is Dreamcast country here...so about 1998-1999, it&#039;s worth the playthrough to be sure...Soul Calibur sold many a Dreamcast.

I&#039;ve heard conflicting reports on the Mission Mode however, i would like to know your source.

If it&#039;s confirmed to *not* have mission mode, then it&#039;s half a game to be honest...i mean that was one of the features that made Soul Calibur worth buying...without it i would say no it wouldn&#039;t be worth it.

But if it does then yes, it&#039;s an amazing game especially back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shrugs*</p>
<p>Well, if this is the original soul calibur which it looks like it is then it&#8217;s a fairly old title&#8230;this is Dreamcast country here&#8230;so about 1998-1999, it&#8217;s worth the playthrough to be sure&#8230;Soul Calibur sold many a Dreamcast.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard conflicting reports on the Mission Mode however, i would like to know your source.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s confirmed to *not* have mission mode, then it&#8217;s half a game to be honest&#8230;i mean that was one of the features that made Soul Calibur worth buying&#8230;without it i would say no it wouldn&#8217;t be worth it.</p>
<p>But if it does then yes, it&#8217;s an amazing game especially back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
