<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take-Two Rejects EA&#8217;s Offer as Opportunistic of GTA IV Sales; Looking at Third-Party Offers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Heru-Ur</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/comment-page-1/#comment-116142</link>
		<dc:creator>Heru-Ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/#comment-116142</guid>
		<description>Well with Activision merged with Blizzard and EA still being EA, really leaves only one option, merger with Ubisoft. Might be a good thing, maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well with Activision merged with Blizzard and EA still being EA, really leaves only one option, merger with Ubisoft. Might be a good thing, maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iku Tri</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/comment-page-1/#comment-115952</link>
		<dc:creator>Iku Tri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/#comment-115952</guid>
		<description>It says that EA is after Take Two because of GTA 4.

Thats probably the most obvious thing I have ever heard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says that EA is after Take Two because of GTA 4.</p>
<p>Thats probably the most obvious thing I have ever heard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChaosBahamut</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/comment-page-1/#comment-115902</link>
		<dc:creator>ChaosBahamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/take-two-rejects-eas-offer-as-opportunistic-of-gta-iv-sales-looking-at-third-party-offers/#comment-115902</guid>
		<description>Man I wish I could buy a lot of Take-Two shares myself. Then I&#039;d be able to prevent a hostile take-over.

Here&#039;s hoping the stockholders heed Take-Two&#039;s advice. &#039;nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I wish I could buy a lot of Take-Two shares myself. Then I&#8217;d be able to prevent a hostile take-over.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping the stockholders heed Take-Two&#8217;s advice. &#8217;nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
