Yes it does. In the same way that the perverted and offensive posts I highlighted reflect badly for the Microsoft corporation. Far worse in fact. It’s a bit dumb that you attack Sony for something and then attack me for highlighting similarly embarrassing activity by Microsoft. This whole article exists because someone did exactly what I did. So its OK for someone to do that when its anti Sony but otherwise its bad? Still, what do I expect from 360 owners? Shouldn’t you be off writing graffiti on PS3 boxes or trying to cool your 360 down in a bucket of water?

You care too much.

Way too much.

This is the same sony that steals stills from PGR to promote SCEA games.
We expect this from them.

Regardless, a SONY based employee on a sony computer still reflects the sony corporation.

go watch “the corporation”

After you have commented on a story by someone who has done exactly the same thing for Sony? Its funny how you condemn me for exposing Microsoft’s silly Wiki posting and yet didn’t do the same for the person who traced one to Sony.

“What a disgrace and low way to go”

Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb. You don’t even know who did it yet you treat it like its company policy. It might have been a subcontracted cleaner for all you know. What you said is as retarded as me trying to make out that the addition of ‘Jethro’ to Wiki’s racial slurs page was done at the request of Bill Gates.

@Norbit: Thats lame to look for Microsofts history. Dont waste your time.

Or “1 person using a PC in a Sony building to troll Wikipedia” to be more accurate.

I just did a little search of Microsofts ip history on Wikipedia:

131.107.151.151 was fixing typo’s on the insulting to french term ‘Cheese eating surrender monkeys’

202.159.8.234 was editing the page for the term ‘Upskirt’

203.41.151.9 was editing the page for the term ‘Cameltoe’

192.92.90.66 added the term ‘Jethro’ to the list of ethnic slurs page

and follow up, it’s happened many times before. Someone who worked in some film company edited the article for some film to say it got terrible ratings from papers and mags that hadn’t read it, and they found the guy who did it and fired him on the spot for besmirching the company name by spreading lies on their IP.