
Shacknews is reporting that Electronic Arts forum users and owners of Spore and Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 and other EA published titles may get banned from their games if they are banned from the forums. Apparently, EA has changed their policy on their forums and when these changes go into effect, your forum login will be attached to your Master EA Account.
According to C&C Community Manager Aaron Kaufman a.k.a. “eaapoc“, gamers who violate the Terms of Service agreement within the forums can be banned from all EA-moderated forums and any EA game they may have purchased. What this means is that if you act unsavory in forums, you could be banned from posting and also banned from playing your game because your account and serial number are all connected.
Pulled straight from the forum, here is the post from eaapoc that has so many people in an uproar:
“Your forum account will be directly tied to your Master EA Account, so if we ban you on the forums, you would be banned from the game as well since the login process is the same. And you’d actually be banned from your other EA games as well since its all tied to your account. So if you have Spore and Red Alert 3 and you get yourself banned on our forums or in-game, well, your Spore account would be banned to. It’s all one in the same, so I strongly recommend people play nice and act mature.
All in all, we expect people to come on here and abide by our ToS. We hate banning people, it makes our lives a lot tougher, but its what we have to do.
Those banned will stay banned, but like most other internet services, its not that hard to create a new fake e-mail account. However, its a lot harder to get a new serial key =)”
When further questioned by another forum user, Kaufman elaborated that you must be in severe violation of the ToS to be banned, and since all EA accounts are tied together, acting inappropriately can have dire consequences:
“It’s clearly stated in our “Terms of Service” that your actions on the forums can impact your in-game status. Your forum account is tied to your EA account, that’s not for a bad reason, it’s so we can tie all your stats and profile and such together.
Further, breaking our ToS and getting yourself banned is not easy if you act like a normal mature human being.”
So what will happen if you get in an online argument with a forum moderator who develops a grudge against you and bans you just for the simple fact that he can? How is this fair considering that you paid $50 and upwards for your EA published game and are suddenly no longer able to play it?
Shacknews brought that bit of questioning up as well when they sited the scandal that broke back in September when Spore players were threatened with being banned for discussing the DRM in the forums. The thread discussing Spore’s DRM was locked and a message was posted saying that if anyone continued to discuss it that they were at risk of being banned which “in some cases would mean you would need to buy a new copy to play Spore”.
EA responded, called it a case of “mis-communication” posted by an “over-zealous community volunteer” and said that all forum users were free to discuss DRM or anything else they like as long as it was kept civil.
Looking over the Terms of Service agreement, nothing is really stated in regards to what will happen to you should you violate the ToS, and the only thing that caught me off guard a bit was the phrase “Specific EA Services may also post additional rules that apply to your conduct on those services”, which means that each EA site possibly has more rules of conduct, who knows what your punishment will be should you act in a way they personally do not find redeemable.
While it is understandable for forum moderators to remove posts or ban certain members for continue to post vulgarity, harassing or racist comments, or spam – how does this give them the right to keep people from playing a game that they paid for legally? We are all familiar with some of the different types of people in online forums and communities, and while some may be annoying, perverted and insulting at times, they still have every right to play a game they have purchased no matter if they act like an ill-mannered baboon or not.
Hopefully EA will clear this up soon like they did the last time, and if it is indeed the case that gamers will be banned from their games, EA should seriously consider getting out of the business of videogames, because otherwise they will start losing more money than they ever dreamed.
Darrell on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
GenericHandleID on Boston Dynamic’s “Big Dog” is Half of a Real-Life Metal Gear
Bronson on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
Zerr on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
Zerr on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
Guido on RUMOR: Future Xbox Console Coming in 2010 – Achievements to Carry Over
Immortal_Tech_The_truth on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
moobies on How to Use a PS3 Controller on a PC
NON-LIFER on Workaround for Crysis CD-Key Issues
Christina on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
Delanas on Midas Magic Spells of Aurum Oblivion Mod
Delanas on Midas Magic Spells of Aurum Oblivion Mod
camboneo on How to Use a PS3 Controller on a PC
oyeaa on Assassin’s Creed 2 Tokyo Game Show 2009 Trailer
Mohan on NARUTO Shippuden: Clash of Ninja Revolution 3 Jutsu Trailer
Jaci on Newsweek Says 3 Year Warranty For Xbox 360 Is Not Enough
brookzy on Sweet Forza 2 Paint Jobs From Japan
carl on One Free Track Pack and One Pay Track Pack Unveiled for Guitar Hero III
bill on World of Warcraft Addiction Stories
dumbasses on Guide On How To Keep A Girl For Gamers
dralith on Open-source Torque MMORPG Engine Released
tholyn on Call of Duty 4 PS3 Being Updated, Online Issues Ironed Out
jacob on Does the Xbox 360 Arcade System Only Come with Arcade Trials?
DMC on MechWarrior 4 For Free is Awesome
dave smith on 1000 Easy Achievement Points In One Day (Xbox 360)