<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Ebert vs. Clive Barker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jlawrence</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-202533</link>
		<dc:creator>jlawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-202533</guid>
		<description>The photo you have chosen of Roger Ebert is what makes it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo you have chosen of Roger Ebert is what makes it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellelettres</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-202310</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellelettres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-202310</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t always agree with Ebert but I sure as hell respect his thought process.

Games are a legitimate phenomenon. They do indeed make a social statement - many, in fact.

A considerable number of gamers need to get a more balanced and objective perspective on their personal relationship with gaming.  If that statement angers you at all, you&#039;re probably one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t always agree with Ebert but I sure as hell respect his thought process.</p>
<p>Games are a legitimate phenomenon. They do indeed make a social statement &#8211; many, in fact.</p>
<p>A considerable number of gamers need to get a more balanced and objective perspective on their personal relationship with gaming.  If that statement angers you at all, you&#8217;re probably one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert oswalt</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-202078</link>
		<dc:creator>robert oswalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-202078</guid>
		<description>All I get out of this is that Ebert dosen&#039;t like games... and so why then does he go on so about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I get out of this is that Ebert dosen&#8217;t like games&#8230; and so why then does he go on so about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rr</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-88354</link>
		<dc:creator>rr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-88354</guid>
		<description>The Barker-Ebert exchange proves two things.  First, Barker is an intellectual lightweight compared to Ebert (and a lot of other folks as well).  Barker just gets mauled here.  Second, William just doesn&#039;t get it.  I am afraid William and Barker have been gaming too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Barker-Ebert exchange proves two things.  First, Barker is an intellectual lightweight compared to Ebert (and a lot of other folks as well).  Barker just gets mauled here.  Second, William just doesn&#8217;t get it.  I am afraid William and Barker have been gaming too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heru-Ur</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-25832</link>
		<dc:creator>Heru-Ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-25832</guid>
		<description>Seriously, Ebert&#039;s been a moron since before i was born. If its not black and white French Noir, its crap to him, end of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Ebert&#8217;s been a moron since before i was born. If its not black and white French Noir, its crap to him, end of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-25799</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-25799</guid>
		<description>Very critical of one of our great critics, and although I don&#039;t agree with him, I think that Ebert has definitely earned more respect than what you have given him.  He gave some very good replies to Barker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very critical of one of our great critics, and although I don&#8217;t agree with him, I think that Ebert has definitely earned more respect than what you have given him.  He gave some very good replies to Barker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DdS</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-16838</link>
		<dc:creator>DdS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/roger-ebert-vs-clive-barker/#comment-16838</guid>
		<description>Whether you agree or not with Ebert or Backer comes second when you defame and start getting all personal.
I admire Roger Ebert as a film reviewer and it&#039;s true that he knows little about videogames, but that does not mean he is uneducated or moronic, nor he needs medical attention. I do not know, William, why you have to write in such way, in a tone I do not find in any of Ebert&#039;s answers, and that discredits your opinions.
I doesn&#039;t matter if videogames can be art or not if we cannot even respect each other.

PS:Sorry about the writing, for I am Spanish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you agree or not with Ebert or Backer comes second when you defame and start getting all personal.<br />
I admire Roger Ebert as a film reviewer and it&#8217;s true that he knows little about videogames, but that does not mean he is uneducated or moronic, nor he needs medical attention. I do not know, William, why you have to write in such way, in a tone I do not find in any of Ebert&#8217;s answers, and that discredits your opinions.<br />
I doesn&#8217;t matter if videogames can be art or not if we cannot even respect each other.</p>
<p>PS:Sorry about the writing, for I am Spanish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
