<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rainbow Six Vegas 2 Now in Stores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xboxlenny</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-113076</link>
		<dc:creator>Xboxlenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/#comment-113076</guid>
		<description>Yes, I absolutly loved Rainbow six vegas one, it was the game of choice until i got used to call of duty 4, now that Rainbow Six vegas 2 is out, where is the difference from the first vegas? from reading theres isnt much change ecept the ability to run and more difficult AI etc.... over all not much is new.  so Call of Duty 4 still takes the cake. Ubisoft needed to live up to Call of Duty 4 and surpass it, but no such luck. To me its like Rainbow Six vegas 1.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I absolutly loved Rainbow six vegas one, it was the game of choice until i got used to call of duty 4, now that Rainbow Six vegas 2 is out, where is the difference from the first vegas? from reading theres isnt much change ecept the ability to run and more difficult AI etc&#8230;. over all not much is new.  so Call of Duty 4 still takes the cake. Ubisoft needed to live up to Call of Duty 4 and surpass it, but no such luck. To me its like Rainbow Six vegas 1.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/comment-page-1/#comment-113054</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/rainbow-six-vegas-2-now-in-stores/#comment-113054</guid>
		<description>This game is really bad, and is the same as vegas 1, they tried to hide it visually, tons of bad game decisions left people wall glitching still (same as vegas 1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This game is really bad, and is the same as vegas 1, they tried to hide it visually, tons of bad game decisions left people wall glitching still (same as vegas 1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
