<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher Influence on Gaming Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/publisher-influence-on-gaming-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/publisher-influence-on-gaming-press/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/publisher-influence-on-gaming-press/comment-page-1/#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/publisher-influence-on-gaming-press/#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to keep in mind what was said at the end of that piece.  Something to the effect of &#039;if I say a bad game is good, I&#039;ll lose my readers.&#039;  This is most definitely the case.  Sure, you can miss a review every once in a while, but if you have a loyal readership, and you continually bombard them with reviews that give bad games good scores, they&#039;re going to go looking elsewhere for that content.  This type of behavior isn&#039;t reserved to the gaming industry, but it does appear to be a bit more prominent here.  

I&#039;d also point out that the reason that a title like Fallout 3 is gracing 20 magazine covers is not because those writers were invited to Bethesda.  It&#039;s because a vast number of gamers are interested in that title.  Let&#039;s face it, it&#039;s all about numbers (mag sales, circulation, hits, whatever).  Putting Fallout 3 on the cover garners numbers, so whether or not a junket was involved, those covers were going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to keep in mind what was said at the end of that piece.  Something to the effect of &#8216;if I say a bad game is good, I&#8217;ll lose my readers.&#8217;  This is most definitely the case.  Sure, you can miss a review every once in a while, but if you have a loyal readership, and you continually bombard them with reviews that give bad games good scores, they&#8217;re going to go looking elsewhere for that content.  This type of behavior isn&#8217;t reserved to the gaming industry, but it does appear to be a bit more prominent here.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that the reason that a title like Fallout 3 is gracing 20 magazine covers is not because those writers were invited to Bethesda.  It&#8217;s because a vast number of gamers are interested in that title.  Let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s all about numbers (mag sales, circulation, hits, whatever).  Putting Fallout 3 on the cover garners numbers, so whether or not a junket was involved, those covers were going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
