<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PlayStation 3 Hits New Folding Landmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xboxlenny</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-29958</link>
		<dc:creator>Xboxlenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/#comment-29958</guid>
		<description>Thats great for science. Its good to see the PS3 put to use. I prefer to play games, mabe the PS3 will be used for its true purpose when it gets some good games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats great for science. Its good to see the PS3 put to use. I prefer to play games, mabe the PS3 will be used for its true purpose when it gets some good games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used cisco</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-29946</link>
		<dc:creator>used cisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/#comment-29946</guid>
		<description>Wow, thats one mean setup.  I bet you could almost play Crysis with everything turned up to full! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thats one mean setup.  I bet you could almost play Crysis with everything turned up to full! <img src='http://news.filefront.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbit</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-29936</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/#comment-29936</guid>
		<description>True. When they are all linked together they are effectively a supercomputer. IBMs new Supercomputer called Roadrunner uses 16,000 AMD Opteron CPU and 16,000 Cell processors the same as the ones in the PS3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. When they are all linked together they are effectively a supercomputer. IBMs new Supercomputer called Roadrunner uses 16,000 AMD Opteron CPU and 16,000 Cell processors the same as the ones in the PS3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used cisco</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-29882</link>
		<dc:creator>used cisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/playstation-3-hits-new-folding-landmark/#comment-29882</guid>
		<description>&quot;one Petaflop – which is mind blowing considering the amount was once thought to be accomplishable only by a supercomputer.&quot;

Isn&#039;t this still the case?  I mean if it took 41K PS3s to do a petaflop, I would say that would make one helluva supercomputer if a machine could do that on its own.  Is there even a supercomputer out there with this kind of throughput potential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;one Petaflop – which is mind blowing considering the amount was once thought to be accomplishable only by a supercomputer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this still the case?  I mean if it took 41K PS3s to do a petaflop, I would say that would make one helluva supercomputer if a machine could do that on its own.  Is there even a supercomputer out there with this kind of throughput potential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
