<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play Digital Tests Gears of War PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/play-digital-tests-gears-of-war-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/play-digital-tests-gears-of-war-pc/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joelteon7</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/play-digital-tests-gears-of-war-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-54676</link>
		<dc:creator>Joelteon7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/play-digital-tests-gears-of-war-pc/#comment-54676</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be rumbled for this, but...I didn&#039;t enjoy GoW THAT much (please, don&#039;t take this the wrong way, I did enjoy it, just, not 10/10 enjoy). My main concern for it is multi-player and I know it&#039;s a squad-based game, but the only games now which are acceptable to have anything less than 32 players is mostly reserved for strategy games. With the technology around, there is absolutely no reason why it should be 8. Even Halo 3 can get a bit disappointing with its 16, but 8...Battlefield series from the get-go had 32. TF2, 32 upwards. CSS, 64 max. CoD4, 32. 

Whilst the game might be fun as a solo-play (and I found it to be fun, but only really with someone else in the room to share in with the fragging) multi-player did not interest me one iota after a few rounds. 

For those interested in getting the thing for PC, play single-player, then sell it onto a friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be rumbled for this, but&#8230;I didn&#8217;t enjoy GoW THAT much (please, don&#8217;t take this the wrong way, I did enjoy it, just, not 10/10 enjoy). My main concern for it is multi-player and I know it&#8217;s a squad-based game, but the only games now which are acceptable to have anything less than 32 players is mostly reserved for strategy games. With the technology around, there is absolutely no reason why it should be 8. Even Halo 3 can get a bit disappointing with its 16, but 8&#8230;Battlefield series from the get-go had 32. TF2, 32 upwards. CSS, 64 max. CoD4, 32. </p>
<p>Whilst the game might be fun as a solo-play (and I found it to be fun, but only really with someone else in the room to share in with the fragging) multi-player did not interest me one iota after a few rounds. </p>
<p>For those interested in getting the thing for PC, play single-player, then sell it onto a friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
