<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NVIDIA Reveals Two New Quadro Professional Graphics Cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/nvidia-reveals-two-new-quadro-professional-graphics-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/nvidia-reveals-two-new-quadro-professional-graphics-cards/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/nvidia-reveals-two-new-quadro-professional-graphics-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-198151</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=29265#comment-198151</guid>
		<description>Very true. Dumb piece of news, no offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. Dumb piece of news, no offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: u83rmensch</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/nvidia-reveals-two-new-quadro-professional-graphics-cards/comment-page-1/#comment-198112</link>
		<dc:creator>u83rmensch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/?p=29265#comment-198112</guid>
		<description>wrong.. workstation graphics cards are not recomended for gaming 2 reasons. 

1: they are not designed to work with games.. they are designed to slowly render high detailed graphics at large scales. They are also designed for many other very complicated to explain things :P 

2: they will cost you 5X + more then the top of the line graphics card and right now unless you want to play crysis on your 62&#039; LCD TV on highest settings in dx10, you really wont need anything more powerful then a top end 8800 still or if you wanna really go for the top end with out spending 5000+ on a graphics card then the 280GTs are a good way to go.. also look for the ATI 4850 x2&#039;s 

do not buy a workstation graphics card for gaming. you will regret it dearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrong.. workstation graphics cards are not recomended for gaming 2 reasons. </p>
<p>1: they are not designed to work with games.. they are designed to slowly render high detailed graphics at large scales. They are also designed for many other very complicated to explain things <img src='http://news.filefront.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>2: they will cost you 5X + more then the top of the line graphics card and right now unless you want to play crysis on your 62&#8242; LCD TV on highest settings in dx10, you really wont need anything more powerful then a top end 8800 still or if you wanna really go for the top end with out spending 5000+ on a graphics card then the 280GTs are a good way to go.. also look for the ATI 4850 x2&#8217;s </p>
<p>do not buy a workstation graphics card for gaming. you will regret it dearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
