<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Beautiful Katamari DLC is a Ripoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ...</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-87757</link>
		<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-87757</guid>
		<description>Pete says: 
October 20th, 2007 at 3:48 pm 

&quot;Microsoft has a TCR (Technical Certification Requirement) that disallows this practice — you can&#039;t pay to unlock additional content on the disc. And trust me, they intensively test each TCR. This is FUD.&quot;

Not only is this twisting the law (they did actually use extra content - the presents&#039; textures and maybe the cousins&#039; - but releasing it on the Internet on day one instead of just putting it on the disk is nothing less than skipping around the TCR), then... it&#039;s also stupid. Many gamers don&#039;t have Internet at all, and there are also those (like me) who have Internet access but can&#039;t get VG consoles to connect to it. If they were going to add extra content on launch day, then where is the sense in limiting it to those who actually have video game Internet?

And I noticed something else: On the ice platform in the Princedom, there are two circles of melted snow that normally indicate locked levels, even after completing the game. As in, this was their plan from the very beginning; to squeeze cash out of Net-surfers and leave everyone else with half a game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete says:<br />
October 20th, 2007 at 3:48 pm </p>
<p>&#8220;Microsoft has a TCR (Technical Certification Requirement) that disallows this practice — you can&#8217;t pay to unlock additional content on the disc. And trust me, they intensively test each TCR. This is FUD.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not only is this twisting the law (they did actually use extra content &#8211; the presents&#8217; textures and maybe the cousins&#8217; &#8211; but releasing it on the Internet on day one instead of just putting it on the disk is nothing less than skipping around the TCR), then&#8230; it&#8217;s also stupid. Many gamers don&#8217;t have Internet at all, and there are also those (like me) who have Internet access but can&#8217;t get VG consoles to connect to it. If they were going to add extra content on launch day, then where is the sense in limiting it to those who actually have video game Internet?</p>
<p>And I noticed something else: On the ice platform in the Princedom, there are two circles of melted snow that normally indicate locked levels, even after completing the game. As in, this was their plan from the very beginning; to squeeze cash out of Net-surfers and leave everyone else with half a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euge</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-59715</link>
		<dc:creator>euge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-59715</guid>
		<description>sorry that last post I was typing in haste on an SK, but I was obvious referring to the size of the DLC. The levels aren&#039;t adding any extra objects, so the levels won&#039;t contain anything new other than a handful of new cousins, and possibly a couple presents, which considering the minimalistic style of the game, definitely would not require much resources. With 200 pts per level, and 4 levels, 800 pts total, it comes out to an extra 10 bucks on a 40 dollar game because every 100 microsoft pts costs $1.25, and when the industry standard is now set to $60 at launch for just about every new release, you all ought to be thanking them for not giving you a $70 bill for a great game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry that last post I was typing in haste on an SK, but I was obvious referring to the size of the DLC. The levels aren&#8217;t adding any extra objects, so the levels won&#8217;t contain anything new other than a handful of new cousins, and possibly a couple presents, which considering the minimalistic style of the game, definitely would not require much resources. With 200 pts per level, and 4 levels, 800 pts total, it comes out to an extra 10 bucks on a 40 dollar game because every 100 microsoft pts costs $1.25, and when the industry standard is now set to $60 at launch for just about every new release, you all ought to be thanking them for not giving you a $70 bill for a great game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: euge</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-59713</link>
		<dc:creator>euge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-59713</guid>
		<description>I agree that its more than enough, and that the extra eoom is for textures for the extra  cousins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that its more than enough, and that the extra eoom is for textures for the extra  cousins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blarb</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-54936</link>
		<dc:creator>Blarb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-54936</guid>
		<description>Shut up for christ&#039;s sake. It isn&#039;t LOCKED onto the disc. Its basically items that ALREADY exist in the game reconfigured into new levels, cousins, and challenges. Jesus fricken crime-a-netly. If I do remember correctly Halo queers pumped out 12$ just to get stupid ass game modes that weren&#039;t worth anything.

If you like a game, and you like the company that makes the game, support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shut up for christ&#8217;s sake. It isn&#8217;t LOCKED onto the disc. Its basically items that ALREADY exist in the game reconfigured into new levels, cousins, and challenges. Jesus fricken crime-a-netly. If I do remember correctly Halo queers pumped out 12$ just to get stupid ass game modes that weren&#8217;t worth anything.</p>
<p>If you like a game, and you like the company that makes the game, support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Moir</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-46296</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Moir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-46296</guid>
		<description>@mike
&quot;you guys are idiot and the kind of pepole who are gonna get walked on there whole lives&quot;
If we were geting walked on, why would we be here to debate over this?

I can understand how people can see it as a rip-off, but lets get back to the point of this. It&#039;s not about DLC in general, it&#039;s about Katamari. Bringing it to XB360 will bring in some new players who havn&#039;t played the other 3 sony exclusive games. That being said, Katamari is not one of those BIG games. It&#039;s a very arcade-style game, and because of that, new buyers may not be willing to buy it at full price. Dropping the price was a good idea, but perhaps the producers wanted to see just how much the new market enjoyed it? So bring it out at a cheaper price, then have the option of buying more. 

Another scenario, is that they may be willing to be bringing out new levels at a later date, but wanted to see whether people would buy them. I think if this gets any bigger and reaches the creators, they&#039;ll probably make a statement that&#039;ll clear it all up. I&#039;d love to hear their reasoning on this. I am quite sure that they&#039;re not doing it to squeeze out money though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike<br />
&#8220;you guys are idiot and the kind of pepole who are gonna get walked on there whole lives&#8221;<br />
If we were geting walked on, why would we be here to debate over this?</p>
<p>I can understand how people can see it as a rip-off, but lets get back to the point of this. It&#8217;s not about DLC in general, it&#8217;s about Katamari. Bringing it to XB360 will bring in some new players who havn&#8217;t played the other 3 sony exclusive games. That being said, Katamari is not one of those BIG games. It&#8217;s a very arcade-style game, and because of that, new buyers may not be willing to buy it at full price. Dropping the price was a good idea, but perhaps the producers wanted to see just how much the new market enjoyed it? So bring it out at a cheaper price, then have the option of buying more. </p>
<p>Another scenario, is that they may be willing to be bringing out new levels at a later date, but wanted to see whether people would buy them. I think if this gets any bigger and reaches the creators, they&#8217;ll probably make a statement that&#8217;ll clear it all up. I&#8217;d love to hear their reasoning on this. I am quite sure that they&#8217;re not doing it to squeeze out money though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weclock</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45407</link>
		<dc:creator>weclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45407</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t mind it, but I wasn&#039;t going to buy it anyway, I&#039;m not interested in Katamari Damancy, and I don&#039;t have a 360, so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t mind it, but I wasn&#8217;t going to buy it anyway, I&#8217;m not interested in Katamari Damancy, and I don&#8217;t have a 360, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Greiman</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45405</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Greiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45405</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a free market folks...  Vote with your dollars if you don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a free market folks&#8230;  Vote with your dollars if you don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45269</guid>
		<description>Trevor says:
&quot;(But I tend to agree with the rest of the sentiment. Whether or not it&#039;s already on the disc, releasing it on the same week as the main full-price release and charging points for it is a very shady practice, and I&#039;d be strenuously objecting if anyone proposed doing such a thing where I work.)&quot;
I&#039;m glad they&#039;re doing it this soon. We knew to expect downloadable content, why not right away?
And of course, there&#039;s always the publishing time. DLC has much less publishing time than stamping discs and shipping to stores. I&#039;ll bet these levels weren&#039;t complete when publishing started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor says:<br />
&#8220;(But I tend to agree with the rest of the sentiment. Whether or not it&#8217;s already on the disc, releasing it on the same week as the main full-price release and charging points for it is a very shady practice, and I&#8217;d be strenuously objecting if anyone proposed doing such a thing where I work.)&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re doing it this soon. We knew to expect downloadable content, why not right away?<br />
And of course, there&#8217;s always the publishing time. DLC has much less publishing time than stamping discs and shipping to stores. I&#8217;ll bet these levels weren&#8217;t complete when publishing started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanB</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45237</link>
		<dc:creator>DanB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45237</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s shady because it is content they created early enough to be in the game but didn&#039;t add for whatever reason.  I&#039;m on the wagon that they wanted to have a lower price point to sell a higher volume but still wanted to cash in as much as they could.  All the katamari fanatics will download the stuff, and they end up selling a few more due to the price.

It doesn&#039;t matter if it is on the disc or not...the question is why didn&#039;t they just include it?

@Casiotone: So you&#039;re saying that since PS3 costs more, publishers wouldn&#039;t try and milk customers for money?  The console maker is the one setting the price for the hardware, while the publishers are the ones dealing with DLC.  Not the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s shady because it is content they created early enough to be in the game but didn&#8217;t add for whatever reason.  I&#8217;m on the wagon that they wanted to have a lower price point to sell a higher volume but still wanted to cash in as much as they could.  All the katamari fanatics will download the stuff, and they end up selling a few more due to the price.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if it is on the disc or not&#8230;the question is why didn&#8217;t they just include it?</p>
<p>@Casiotone: So you&#8217;re saying that since PS3 costs more, publishers wouldn&#8217;t try and milk customers for money?  The console maker is the one setting the price for the hardware, while the publishers are the ones dealing with DLC.  Not the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weclock</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45193</link>
		<dc:creator>weclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45193</guid>
		<description>@Casiotone,
The Wii is the cheapest, are you ignorant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Casiotone,<br />
The Wii is the cheapest, are you ignorant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casiotone</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-45069</link>
		<dc:creator>Casiotone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-45069</guid>
		<description>You guys got a 360, you should have been prepared for this. Didn&#039;t you think it was fishy that out of all the new consoles, the 360 was the cheapest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys got a 360, you should have been prepared for this. Didn&#8217;t you think it was fishy that out of all the new consoles, the 360 was the cheapest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbs</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44986</link>
		<dc:creator>cbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44986</guid>
		<description>Does it really make any difference?  If they are going to make add-ons to the game that you have to buy separately what is the difference if they come on the disc and are locked or have to be downloaded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it really make any difference?  If they are going to make add-ons to the game that you have to buy separately what is the difference if they come on the disc and are locked or have to be downloaded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44936</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44936</guid>
		<description>Wait.. your evidence that the levels aren&#039;t on the game disc is that the download is only 384kb?

I&#039;m lead programmer on a pretty high-profile game at the moment, and can state without reservation that we could create an extra level in our game, using substantially less than 386kb of data, just by reusing art assets we&#039;d already used in other levels.

In fact, even at 384kb, I&#039;m wondering what the hell they&#039;re putting into them to make them so big..  fundamentally all that the download should include is a little list that says &quot;put a can of soup here, put a can of soup there, put a can of soup over there... time limit: 5 minutes.&quot;  Shouldn&#039;t be more than about 40-50 kb, tops, unless there are a couple new textures in there (perhaps to integrate into the UI?)  

I haven&#039;t played Beautiful Katamari myself (not yet released locally) so can&#039;t really confirm, but merely going by the file size as evidence doesn&#039;t convince me at all.

(But I tend to agree with the rest of the sentiment.  Whether or not it&#039;s already on the disc, releasing it on the same week as the main full-price release and charging points for it is a very shady practice, and I&#039;d be strenuously objecting if anyone proposed doing such a thing where I work.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.. your evidence that the levels aren&#8217;t on the game disc is that the download is only 384kb?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m lead programmer on a pretty high-profile game at the moment, and can state without reservation that we could create an extra level in our game, using substantially less than 386kb of data, just by reusing art assets we&#8217;d already used in other levels.</p>
<p>In fact, even at 384kb, I&#8217;m wondering what the hell they&#8217;re putting into them to make them so big..  fundamentally all that the download should include is a little list that says &#8220;put a can of soup here, put a can of soup there, put a can of soup over there&#8230; time limit: 5 minutes.&#8221;  Shouldn&#8217;t be more than about 40-50 kb, tops, unless there are a couple new textures in there (perhaps to integrate into the UI?)  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t played Beautiful Katamari myself (not yet released locally) so can&#8217;t really confirm, but merely going by the file size as evidence doesn&#8217;t convince me at all.</p>
<p>(But I tend to agree with the rest of the sentiment.  Whether or not it&#8217;s already on the disc, releasing it on the same week as the main full-price release and charging points for it is a very shady practice, and I&#8217;d be strenuously objecting if anyone proposed doing such a thing where I work.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weclock</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44926</link>
		<dc:creator>weclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44926</guid>
		<description>@Clown Soup-
I don&#039;t really think that analogy applies, considering you down own the rights to the content on the disc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clown Soup-<br />
I don&#8217;t really think that analogy applies, considering you down own the rights to the content on the disc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44908</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44908</guid>
		<description>what is wrong with you guys!!!
pretty soon your gonna buy the game and the only thing your going to be paying for is the plastic its made out of!!

its not so much the game its the fact that there doing this 
its really unfair!


clown soup made a good point you guys are idiot and the kind of pepole who are gonna get walked on there whole lives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is wrong with you guys!!!<br />
pretty soon your gonna buy the game and the only thing your going to be paying for is the plastic its made out of!!</p>
<p>its not so much the game its the fact that there doing this<br />
its really unfair!</p>
<p>clown soup made a good point you guys are idiot and the kind of pepole who are gonna get walked on there whole lives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clown Soup</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44895</link>
		<dc:creator>Clown Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44895</guid>
		<description>#  weclock says: I don&#039;t know, I don&#039;t really see it as a rip off. I mean, they could have just not put them on the disc.

You are *SO* right.
I&#039;m waiting for the day that automobile manufacturers require that you call in to a special flat tire hotline and pay an extra $50 for an unlock code to access your spare tire. Remember, it&#039;s not a rip off, I mean, they could have just not put it in the trunk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  weclock says: I don&#8217;t know, I don&#8217;t really see it as a rip off. I mean, they could have just not put them on the disc.</p>
<p>You are *SO* right.<br />
I&#8217;m waiting for the day that automobile manufacturers require that you call in to a special flat tire hotline and pay an extra $50 for an unlock code to access your spare tire. Remember, it&#8217;s not a rip off, I mean, they could have just not put it in the trunk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylawl</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44864</guid>
		<description>This is done a lot with XBDLC, it&#039;s really not uncommon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is done a lot with XBDLC, it&#8217;s really not uncommon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: game pirate</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44859</link>
		<dc:creator>game pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44859</guid>
		<description>This is a great anti-piracy technique. Think of it... to crack the DVD not only do I have to figure out what missing content gets downloaded (384k is more than just a key), but I probably also have to crack the pairing between the DVD and my live account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great anti-piracy technique. Think of it&#8230; to crack the DVD not only do I have to figure out what missing content gets downloaded (384k is more than just a key), but I probably also have to crack the pairing between the DVD and my live account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weclock</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44844</link>
		<dc:creator>weclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44844</guid>
		<description>@ Dave-
I think the conversation has gone beyond Katamari. I think it&#039;s more along the lines of a general DLC on disc, that you have to pay for.

@Silentshank-
When you buy a DVD you are not allowed full access to the content. You own the disc, but not the content on the disc. Or at least, that&#039;s what American Federal laws have to say on the matter. I still agree with Che, it&#039;s not a rip off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dave-<br />
I think the conversation has gone beyond Katamari. I think it&#8217;s more along the lines of a general DLC on disc, that you have to pay for.</p>
<p>@Silentshank-<br />
When you buy a DVD you are not allowed full access to the content. You own the disc, but not the content on the disc. Or at least, that&#8217;s what American Federal laws have to say on the matter. I still agree with Che, it&#8217;s not a rip off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-44837</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/new-beautiful-katamari-dlc-is-a-ripoff/#comment-44837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tellin&#039; ya guys, the only things that are already on the disc that you&#039;re unlocking is any object from the collection that hasn&#039;t already been used in a level. The object arrangement is brand new, and isn&#039;t on the disc already.

Would you be happy if each download was padded to 500 MB? You&#039;re basically up in arms because NBGI is using a wonderful method to store a level, and you don&#039;t think it&#039;s big enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tellin&#8217; ya guys, the only things that are already on the disc that you&#8217;re unlocking is any object from the collection that hasn&#8217;t already been used in a level. The object arrangement is brand new, and isn&#8217;t on the disc already.</p>
<p>Would you be happy if each download was padded to 500 MB? You&#8217;re basically up in arms because NBGI is using a wonderful method to store a level, and you don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s big enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
