<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to Discontinue Pentium D Processors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Heru-Ur</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-33295</link>
		<dc:creator>Heru-Ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/#comment-33295</guid>
		<description>AMD FTW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goods</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-33074</link>
		<dc:creator>goods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/#comment-33074</guid>
		<description>why?  Why wouldnt they.  For Pentium D, this is already old news.  They have moved to Core 2 Duo, so who needs Pentium D? 
As for Core 2 Duo that will EOL, they have already upped the specs on newer versions and moving to 45nm in 2008.  
Tell them to bring em on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?  Why wouldnt they.  For Pentium D, this is already old news.  They have moved to Core 2 Duo, so who needs Pentium D?<br />
As for Core 2 Duo that will EOL, they have already upped the specs on newer versions and moving to 45nm in 2008.<br />
Tell them to bring em on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGI</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-32811</link>
		<dc:creator>AGI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/#comment-32811</guid>
		<description>WITH ALL THE RESPECT AND LOVE FOR INTEL, BUT I THINK THAT REALY SOUND STUPID 
AND LIKE THE OTHER PERSON ASKED WHY I&#039;D LIKE TO KNOW...

PEACE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WITH ALL THE RESPECT AND LOVE FOR INTEL, BUT I THINK THAT REALY SOUND STUPID<br />
AND LIKE THE OTHER PERSON ASKED WHY I&#8217;D LIKE TO KNOW&#8230;</p>
<p>PEACE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perpy12</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-32805</link>
		<dc:creator>Perpy12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/intel-to-discontinue-pentium-d-processors/#comment-32805</guid>
		<description>why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
