Comments on: First Eight Minutes of Sony’s PS3 Exclusive ‘Afrika’ Really Packs a Punch

By: xx-Thor-xx

xx-Thor-xx — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:15:51 +0000

@ pariah:
yea but then you don’t get to have cool contests like, “who can take the best picture of a rhinoceros’ ass” or “who can get a picture with the most lions attacking a gazelle”

By: Pariah

Pariah — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:59:29 +0000

It doesn’t seem like the most rivoting of game concepts… I could just buy a cheap camera and run around photographing squirrels outside for less than buying this, get fresh air, exercise and probably have more fun in the process too…

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:46:32 +0000

Haha. Yes. Very much so.

By: CanadianCow

CanadianCow — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:33:32 +0000

To Matt: Sarcasim?

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:53:31 +0000

I’m just glad Sony is keeping the real good exclusives, like Afrika. I mean…who needs Final Fantasy exclusivity when you have Afrika.

By: Serio

Serio — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:21:13 +0000

I didn’t say anything about that. What’s the difference between Animals and normal models? I’m just saying with the PS3’s power, they should be able to produce something alittle more… ground breaking than that. It just looks too clean.

By: Norbit

Norbit — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:50:46 +0000

Serio

Are you seriously saying that screenshot looks bad?

Can you name me a game that has a better looking animal than that?

No.

The simple fact is that its a PS3 exclusive so you automatically have to attack it even if it makes you look like an idiot.

By: mybum

mybum — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:28:16 +0000

wtf
its like endless ocean for wii
so this is one of the blockbuser exclusive for ps3?

By: Serio

Serio — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:17:13 +0000

I’m going to bet Assassin’s Creed was more fun than this. For one; If that picture is ingame, i’m VERY disappointed with graphics. If the PS3 really is that powerful, they could have used something… More realistic?

By: Stephany

Stephany — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:32:09 +0000

No Matt, they already made that game. Its called Assassin Creed! Oooh! I went there!

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:00:31 +0000

I really don’t understand how anyone could be the least bit excited about this game.

I mean…really? What’s next “Paint Drying Contest Wii Edition”

By: Bounce

Bounce — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:03 +0000

Booooooring.

By: Norbit

Norbit — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:15:29 +0000

Maybe its because sane people dont find killing animals enjoyable?

By: Rollett

Rollett — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:46:12 +0000

Whats wrong with having a game of some sort that does not have a gun ?

By: xx-Thor-xx

xx-Thor-xx — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:06:10 +0000

Pokemon Snap for the next generation … YAY!

By: Mericet

Mericet — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:55:50 +0000

Because there are some sad, possibly deranged individuals who form the bulk of so-called ’special interest groups’ for the welfare of animals who would shake their collective noggins in disapproval and demand that it be pulled from shelves.

PETA sucks.

By: CanadianCow

CanadianCow — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:04:11 +0000

At first I thought it was a VERY good looking hunting game. Hell, why don’t they keep all the animals and add Tribal Village 1 vs Tribal Village 2. If the ps3 is so powerful, why not do that? The game looks excellent, the animals look smart, throw in some guns and lets have some fun.