By: henry swanson

henry swanson — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:58:21 +0000

Sure, Green_peas might well now be a.nother severely self-compromised, toothless, hyper-bureaucratic organization now more concerned with their letterhead logos then the actual environment – but even suggesting that your standard Evil ‘profits before people’TM Corporation is really doing ANYTHING WHATSOEVER to ‘help’ Mother Earth is a blatant white-faced (’green-washing’) lie of Babylonian proportions that I cannot take. The reason “no one listens to them anyway” – or Mother Nature for that matter – oh Stalker, is that Gamers (yeah, just like me) are fully content to let the world around them burn.. as long as the Great Game is never interrupted, we’ll blindly continue playing around to the literal ends of the Earth. It is, and always has been a central matter of profoundly unconscious human beings needing to Wake Up, expand their Minds and not their scores – and smell the environmental ashes of their own making. “Trees? Oh I like trees as much as the next person.. I’ve seen some great ones rendered in this cool game I’ve got. They’re fully destructible too! Cool!” -Ever thought about where all that electricity for your energy-sucking gfx cards comes from? How it’s all made? Do you even care? ..I’m not even sure I do.. Worried (Just Not Worried Enough), Henry Swanson

By: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:31:53 +0000

Greenpeace is full of idiots and no one listens to them anyway

By: Norbit

Norbit — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:16:27 +0000

In order to challenge this you will have to prove that the companies rated higher than Nintendo are actually worse offenders than they are. Strangely neither yourselves nor Ars technica have done that. All you have done is say they aren’t as bad as Greenpeace are making out but all Greenpeace have said is that Nintendo are the worst of the lot.

Comments on: Ars Technica Challenges Greenpeace over Nintendo’s Poor Environmental Rating

By: henry swanson

By: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

By: Norbit