<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Activision vs. Harmonix, Round 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/</link>
	<description>News for Gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:36:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xboxlenny</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72690</link>
		<dc:creator>Xboxlenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/#comment-72690</guid>
		<description>This is good, they should have it open to both guitars and equipment. If you paid for a guitar either Rock band or Guitar here you should be able to use it on either game, you own the damn thing. So EA and Activision dont be cheap about it, cant you all get along? you are only hurting the customers and makes you look small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good, they should have it open to both guitars and equipment. If you paid for a guitar either Rock band or Guitar here you should be able to use it on either game, you own the damn thing. So EA and Activision dont be cheap about it, cant you all get along? you are only hurting the customers and makes you look small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72582</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/#comment-72582</guid>
		<description>“Fine, you can use it, but we expect an agreement that includes compensation for us.”


That&#039;s the same impression I got. Harmonix won&#039;t consider paying, Activision is &#039;blocking&#039; by requiring them to pay (potential legal action if Harmonix didn&#039;t compensate for use of &quot;Activision&#039;s technology&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Fine, you can use it, but we expect an agreement that includes compensation for us.”</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the same impression I got. Harmonix won&#8217;t consider paying, Activision is &#8216;blocking&#8217; by requiring them to pay (potential legal action if Harmonix didn&#8217;t compensate for use of &#8220;Activision&#8217;s technology&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/comment-page-1/#comment-72507</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.filefront.com/activision-vs-harmonix-round-2/#comment-72507</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll have to see if we can get some word from Sony on what the real deal is.

For now, gamers are screwed, it would seem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll have to see if we can get some word from Sony on what the real deal is.</p>
<p>For now, gamers are screwed, it would seem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
